The NDIA’s home and living framework
| A framework is:
|
| The NDIA’s home and living framework is about supporting participants:
|
| The NDIA asked the Reference Group what they think about their work on the framework so far. |
| The Reference Group explained that the NDIA could make sure the framework is accessible. |
| When information is accessible, it is easy to:
|
This includes providing the information in different ways. For example: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Members also shared how some words in the framework should change. For example, they think the framework shouldn’t use the word ‘assessment’. |
| They also think the framework should explain ideas clearly. |
Home and living partners
| The framework will include new home and living partners. Partners are people who help others find and use services. |
| This framework should make it clear what home and living partners will do. |
| Reference Group members think the home and living partners should be separate from the NDIS. |
| They also think people who help participants to use their supports should know more about home and living supports. |
Co-design
| Reference Group members talked about how the government will review the NDIS. They told us it is important that the NDIA keep doing home and living co-design while this happens. |
| The NDIA asked Purple Orange to test parts of the framework. Purple Orange is an organisation that supports people with disability to take part in research. |
| Members explained that the NDIA should use what Purple Orange found out. |
| Members also told us the home and living framework should work with other NDIA co‑design work. |
The NDIA’s home and living framework
| A framework is:
|
| The NDIA’s home and living framework is about supporting participants:
|
| The NDIA asked the Reference Group what they think about their work on the framework so far. |
| The Reference Group explained that the NDIA could make sure the framework is accessible. |
| When information is accessible, it is easy to:
|
This includes providing the information in different ways. For example: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Members also shared how some words in the framework should change. For example, they think the framework shouldn’t use the word ‘assessment’. |
| They also think the framework should explain ideas clearly. |
Home and living partners
| The framework will include new home and living partners. Partners are people who help others find and use services. |
| This framework should make it clear what home and living partners will do. |
| Reference Group members think the home and living partners should be separate from the NDIS. |
| They also think people who help participants to use their supports should know more about home and living supports. |
Co-design
| Reference Group members talked about how the government will review the NDIS. They told us it is important that the NDIA keep doing home and living co-design while this happens. |
| The NDIA asked Purple Orange to test parts of the framework. Purple Orange is an organisation that supports people with disability to take part in research. |
| Members explained that the NDIA should use what Purple Orange found out. |
| Members also told us the home and living framework should work with other NDIA co‑design work. |

















